Among the study’s conclusions:
* One million PEVs may be on U.S. roadways in a decade, with concentrations of the electric cars in the major metropolitan areas of the West Coast and the Northeast.
* Staggered charging of PEVs would reduce the potential negative impact on electric load.
* Power companies will need new tools to manage growth in PEV use.
“Plug-in electric vehicles represent a significant new set of power users that grid operators must prepare to serve. PEVs also might lead to game-changing innovations in energy distribution and smart grid technology that could enhance grid management and electric system reliability,” said Stephen G. Whitley, 2010 IRC chairman and president & CEO of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).
Of the one million PEVs that may be deployed over the next 10 years, more than 684,000 are projected by the study to be located in regions of the United States served by ISOs and RTOs. The PEVs plugging into the grid in U.S. ISO/RTO regions could add electric load of 3,785 megawatts (MW) if every PEV charged simultaneously. In contrast, electric load would increase by about one-fifth that total (819 MW) if charging were staggered over an eight-hour period and less than 546 MW over a 12-hour period.
The IRC study suggests that initial PEV sales are likely to cluster on the West Coast and Northeast and be heavily concentrated in large urban areas. For example, the Los Angeles metropolitan area is projected to experience the largest growth of PEVs, a total 119,069 by 2019. PEVs in the L.A. region could add electric load of 658 MW if every PEV charged simultaneously. If PEV charging were staggered over an eight-hour period, electric load would increase by 147 MW. Over a 12-hour period, PEV charging would add 98 MW.
The New York City metropolitan area, with a forecasted 54,000 PEVs by 2019, could see added electric load of 299 MW if every PEV charged simultaneously. Electric load would increase by 33 MW if charging were staggered over an eight-hour period and 22 MW over a 12-hour period. Projections of PEV growth and additional electric load for other ISO and RTO regions are available in the report.
The IRC study promotes adoption of smart grid technologies and new pricing mechanisms in an effort to accommodate PEV demands for electricity, avoid potential service disruptions and minimize wholesale electricity price impacts.
The IRC study also examines the feasibility of deploying various smart grid tools and services that would allow grid operators to use PEV technology as an innovative energy storage and distribution resource to balance local energy needs.
For example, during peak demand periods, a power system operator could use smart-grid tools to remotely connect to PEVs that are plugged in and have electricity stored in their batteries. The operator could utilize this power for the grid and then replace it when system conditions improve.
A copy of the report, “Assessment of Plug-in Electric Vehicle Integration with ISO/RTO Systems,” is available at the IRC website, www.iso-rto.org.
Please refer to the iso-rto.org newsroom for media contacts at each IRC member organization.
Created in April 2003, the IRC is comprised of 10 independent system operators (ISOs) and regional transmission organizations (RTOs) in North America. These ISOs and RTOs serve two-thirds of electricity consumers in the United States and more than 50 percent of Canada’s population.
The IRC works collaboratively to develop effective processes, tools, and methods for improving competitive electricity markets across North America. The IRC’s goal is to balance reliability considerations with market practices, resulting in efficient, robust markets that provide competitive and reliable service to electricity users.
The Council’s member organizations include the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO); California Independent System Operator (CAISO); Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT); Ontario’s Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO); ISO New England, Inc. (ISO-NE); Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO); the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO); New Brunswick System Operator (NBSO); PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM); and the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP).
